Search for: "O2 Micro, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2011, 2:07 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
We might have consid- ered BiTEK’s arguments differently had the district court, without briefing, adopted O2 Micro’s proposed injunction and had BiTEK properly objected to the form of the injunction. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 4:42 pm
  In the ID, ALJ Gildea granted the August 14, 2009 motion of Complainants O2 Micro International Ltd. and O2 Micro Inc. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 3:32 pm
  In the Order, ALJ Gildea granted Complainants' O2 Micro International Ltd. and O2 Micro Inc. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 3:57 pm
  In the Order, ALJ Gildea denied a motion to compel filed by Complainants O2 Micro International Ltd. and O2 Micro Inc. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 5:14 pm
  In the Order, ALJ Gildea granted in part Complainants O2 Micro International Ltd. and O2 Micro Inc.'s (collectively, "O2 Micro") motion for summary determination that the activities of Respondent ASUSTeK Computer Inc. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 6:35 pm
  In the Order, ALJ Gildea granted Complainants O2 Micro International Ltd and O2 Micro Inc.'s (collectively, "O2 Micro") motion to compel Respondent Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 7:06 am
O2 Micro Int'l Ltd., the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals held that the district court's appointment of a nonpartisan expert under Federal... [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:14 am by Eric Schweibenz
  In the Order, ALJ Gildea granted-in-part Respondents Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., ASUSTeK Computer Inc., and ASUS Computer International’s (collectively, “Respondents”) motion to strike certain hearing testimony of Complainants O2 Micro International Ltd. and O2 Micro Inc. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 4:45 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In O2 Micro, we held that “[w]hen theparties present a fundamental dispute regarding thescope of a claim term, it is the court’s duty to resolve it. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 4:26 pm
  In the Order, ALJ Gildea denied: (1) respondents Asustek Computer, Inc.'s, Asus Computer International's, and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.'s (collectively, "Respondents") motion to strike the rebuttal expert report of complainants O2 Micro International Ltd.'s and O2 Micro Inc.'s   (collectively, "O2 Micro") expert witness and prevent him from… [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 10:31 pm
O2 Micro's attorney arguments on appeal cannot create an evidentiary gap. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:24 pm by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the Complainants in this investigation are O2 Micro International Ltd. and O2 Micro Inc. [read post]